Hi,
It would be really nice to be able to share specific templates and ISO to specific tenants.
If a reseller has 10 tenants and they want to use a particular template or ISO at present this needs to be uploaded and shared to each tenant (or globally), if they don’t want it to be made globally available then the option to share to just a sub set of tenants would be very handy and save a lot of time and disk space.
Regards,
Mike
Hi,
Just looking at the branding options and found a couple of issues so far ;)
If you choose one of the colour tokens, and then adjust the colours, save to apply, all works fine, but if you then click the option you edited it changes all the colour values back to their default. So would be good to have an option to create a new ‘custom’ token that saves the values you set as defaults.
With the login page settings, after uploading a background image (saving) then loading the page the background image only appears in the top as the height is hardcoded in the CSS as 380px
.auth-one-bg-position {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
right: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 380px;
}
Would be nice to have an option to set this either px or %, whilst changing the CSS will fix this, I’m guessing on an update this will be overwritten.
Thanks,
Mike
Hi,
The main Community and Multiportal Support headings don;t link to their sub forums like the others.
Mike
It would be nice to be able to option to be able to turn on usage reporting for powered off VM’s. We are currently using usage for our billing and would like to be able to bill for powered off VM (CPU & Memory usage).
Hi,
A reseller should have their own catalogue with the ability to restrict which Templates / ISO’s are visible to their tenants. This will save both storage space and time, currently a reseller would have to upload an ISO to multiple tenant catalogues, this feature would allow a single upload.
Also as a Service provider when uploading an ISO it would be nice if we could select multiple tenants to have visibility, but not to make it fully public, and have this as an editable field so that the tenant selection can change over time.
Mike
Fully agree here as well, especially when MP 1.2.0 has just been released and there is no mention of support for PVE 9.2, but we’ve been told that 9.2 support should be in 1.2.0, does that mean it is or isn’t.
Environment
Description
If the QEMU Agent is installed but not running, then selecting the details for a VM takes a long time (12secs to load the page), if the agent is running then the page load is <2 secs - I imagine this is due to MP asking the VM for it’s IP’s details, and has a 10second timeout (not 100% sure on that).
Steps to Reproduce (if applicable)
Expected Behavior
Page should load much quicker
Actual Behavior
Page takes ~12secs to load
