MultiPortal Community Return to multiportal.io
Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Support Portal
Collapse
C

cdicke

@cdicke
Private Beta Migrator
About
Posts
3
Topics
3
Shares
0
Groups
1
Followers
0
Following
0

Posts

Recent Best Controversial

  • Create virtual datacenter via API
    C cdicke

    Environment

    • MultiPortal Version: 1.2.1
    • Proxmox VE Version: 9.2.6
    • Deployment Type: HA Cluster

    Description
    When we create a virtual datacenter via the API, the “reseller” and “tenant” variables in the Proxmox resource pool do not appear to be populated. However, when a datacenter is created via the GUI, the reseller and tenant names do appear there.

    Datacenter Name (GUI): Reseller_XYZ.Kunde_ABC.vdc.9672ec9c-4199-43b0-b258-f2ce4135673c
    c9b07b78-ffda-4468-94d9-79dc8577eca3-image.jpeg

    Datacenter Name (API): reseller.tenant.vdc.bbfa10c2-7c52-4d6e-986f-d6c0c156fd80
    670ac32b-19c1-4eed-8c5d-9bf26def9e41-image.jpeg

    I also checked the swagger documentation but couldn’t find a way to change this behavior.

    Expected Behavior
    The ressource pool on Promox includes the reseller and tenant names also when created via api.

    Actual Behavior
    The ressource pool on Proxmox only includes the id of the virtual datacenter, and doesn’t include the showname of the reseller and tenant when created via api.

    API & Automation

  • CPU Models inconsistent after adding new nodes to the cluster.
    C cdicke

    Environment

    • MultiPortal Version: 1.2.1
    • Proxmox VE Version: 9.2.6
    • Deployment Type: HA Cluster

    Description
    We have only 1 specific CPU Model enabled at datacenter level. While we add new nodes to our cluster, then the new host have enabled 71 CPU Models on the database. On the WebUI there are likely random things enabled / disabled while we flip through the sites.

    Steps to Reproduce (if applicable)

    1. Disable all CPU Models and enable some / one CPU Model(s).
    2. Add new nodes to the cluster.
    3. Some CPU Models you previously disabled becomes randomly enabled.

    Expected Behavior
    New nodes in the cluster get the CPU Models from the existing Nodes.

    Actual Behavior
    New nodes become 71 default enabled CPU Models

    Compute & VMs

  • Support application/x-www-form-urlencoded for the OAuth 2.0 token endpoint
    C cdicke

    Environment

    • MultiPortal Version: 1.2.1
    • Proxmox VE Version: 9.2.6
    • Deployment Type: HA Cluster

    Description
    We are integrating MultiPortal with an existing ITSM system using the OAuth 2.0 client credentials flow.

    The ITSM system sends token requests with the content type:

    application/x-www-form-urlencoded
    

    However, the MultiPortal endpoint /access/get-token currently only accepts:

    multipart/form-data
    

    This content-type mismatch prevents the ITSM system from completing the OAuth authentication flow.

    Expected Behavior
    The endpoint /access/get-token should accept valid OAuth 2.0 token requests encoded as application/x-www-form-urlencoded, including client credentials sent in the request body.

    Support for the existing multipart/form-data format should remain available for backward compatibility.

    Actual Behavior
    The endpoint /access/get-token only accepts requests encoded as multipart/form-data.

    Requests sent with application/x-www-form-urlencoded are rejected, preventing the ITSM system from completing the OAuth 2.0 client credentials flow.

    API & Automation
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
Powered by NodeBB Contributors
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Support Portal