MultiPortal Community Return to multiportal.io
Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Support Portal
Collapse
P

Pean

@Pean
About
Posts
1
Topics
1
Shares
0
Groups
0
Followers
0
Following
0

Posts

Recent Best Controversial

  • Backup verbosity levels seems to high
    P Pean

    I wanted to share some feedback regarding the current backup management output/logging.
    Right now it exposes a lot of internal infrastructure and operational details that probably should not be visible in customer-facing UI/API responses.

    Examples from the current output include:
    API usernames/service accounts and token names
    internal node/hostnames
    storage backend names
    VMIDs
    raw vzdump commands
    internal UUIDs/job IDs
    disk names, layouts and sizes

    Example output:

    UPID:NODENAME:0004C45B:0415EAAB:6A154BC9:vzdump:105:multiportal-API-user@pve!proxmox-api-user
    
    creating Proxmox Backup Server archive 'vm/105/2026-05-26T07:29:13Z'
    include disk 'scsi0' 'linstor-05:pm-9ed46057_105' 67108872K
    VM Name: testvm
    starting new backup job: vzdump 105 --node NODENAME --storage STORAGENAME ...
    

    This makes it possible to map internal infrastructure, naming conventions, storage layout and automation details very easily.
    Would recommend sanitizing or abstracting raw Proxmox/PBS output and only exposing high-level backup status information unless debug/admin mode is explicitly enabled.

    Product Feedback
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
Powered by NodeBB Contributors
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Support Portal